banner ad
Experts Logo

articles

Warning: Failure To Ignore Myths About Flu May Cause Flu

Originally Published in The Goldhaber Warnings Report, January 2013

By: Gerald M. Goldhaber, Ph.D.
Tel: 212-379-6661
Email Dr. Goldhaber


View Profile on Experts.com.


According to news reported almost daily, we are and will continue to experience flu activity in the United States at record levels. Both the CDC and the Mayors of major cities such as Boston and New York have declared public health emergencies blaming the current raging flu epidemic. We all know the symptoms of the flu: aches and pains throughout the body; blocked or runny nose; chills and cold sweats, fever, fatigue or sore throat. Most medical experts agree that the quickest and safest way to prevent the flu is to get a flu shot and let the vaccine now on the market stop the epidemic spread of the flu. Sadly, as of this date, slightly more than 1/3 of our citizens got vaccinated. Since many of my friends and family are among the 2/3 that have resisted getting vaccinated, I have decided to publish the most common myths offered by people to justify their not getting vaccinated.

1. The flu shot causes the flu. Not true. The flu shot is made up of dead viruses that can't make you sick. Because the vaccine takes about two weeks before it becomes totally effective, some people may develop flulike symptoms (e.g. headache or elevated temperature). A few may develop the flu itself during this two-week period, not due to the vaccine but because it takes about two weeks for the vaccine to become fully protective.

2. Prior episodes of the flu make it too late to get vaccinated. Even if you got the flu earlier in the year, you still need a flu shot to protect you from possible new and more virulent strains of the flu beyond the type of flu you had.

3. The flu shot is 100% effective. Although the vaccine is not perfect, the CDC estimates that those who got the flu shot were 62% less likely to get the flu and if they got it, they were at far lower risk of requiring medical care.

4. People who are allergic to eggs cannot get a flu shot. This is a common but totally wrong myth. You should only avoid getting a flu shot if you have a very severe allergy to eggs because current flu shots contain some of the virus grown in eggs.

5. The flu is not much worse than a bad cold. Not true. The flu can be seriously dangerous to the very young or old, pregnant mothers, people with chronic diseases such as COPD, kidney disease, diabetes). In fact over 200,000 Americans went to a hospital last year and 30,000 died from the flu.

Given the severity of the risk facing you by the flu, it is incumbent on all of us to immediately get a flu shot.

Feel free to pass this issue of the Goldhaber Warnings Report on to any friend or colleague.


Dr. Gerald M. Goldhaber, the President of Goldhaber Research Associates, LLC, is a nationally recognized expert in the fields of Political Polling and Warning Label Research. His clients include Fortune 500 companies, as well as educational and governmental organizations. He has conducted hundreds of surveys, including political polls for candidates running for U.S Congress, Senate, and President. Dr. Goldhaber also served as a consultant to President Reagan's Private Sector Survey for Cost Control.

©Copyright - All Rights Reserved

DO NOT REPRODUCE WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION BY AUTHOR.

Related articles

Goldhaber-Research-Associates-Logo.jpg

2/18/2010· Warnings & Labels

Should Cellphones Have Warning Labels?

By: Dr. Gerald Goldhaber

The Goldhaber Warnings Report: On January 2, of this year, The New York Times published an article about the possibility of heavy cellphone use being linked to brain cancer. Since approximately 280 million people use cellphones

Goldhaber-Research-Associates-Logo.jpg

8/30/2017· Warnings & Labels

Close The Revolving Door

By: Dr. Gerald M. Goldhaber

Regulatory agencies (e.g., FDA, OSHA, CPSC, NHTSA, etc.) exist to serve and protect the public from bad actors in the corporate or industrial world whose decisions and actions may lead to products or services that could potentially harm or kill workers and consumers. It would seem obvious, therefore, that the leaders of these agencies would be strong, neutral and objective regulators without close ties to the very industries they must regulate. Under such a model, the best interests of the public could be served without concern for the profits of the regulated industries. Unfortunately, as anyone who reads any newspaper knows too well, that model has never been true. In fact, since the creation of virtually every regulatory agency, the leadership of these agencies have either come from or exited to the very industries they were to regulate.

expert_placeholder

3/26/2014· Warnings & Labels

Warnings: When Do They Help, When Do They Hurt?

By: Dr. Kenneth Solomon

In essence, to warn is to place someone on advance notice of a danger or a potential danger. To warn requires that the person or people giving the warning have a superior knowledge of the harm or potential harm compared to the person or people exposed. Further, the person or the people who are warning must also have a superior knowledge of the means of reducing either the likelihood and/or the magnitude of the harm or potential harm as compared with the person or people exposed.

;
Experts.com-No broker Movie Ad

Follow us

linkedin logo youtube logo rss feed logo
;