banner ad
Experts Logo

articles

Automated Retrieval System Failure Results in Catastrophic Fire at Storage Facility

By: Bill O'Donnell
Tel: 412-835-5007
Email Mr. O'Donnell


View Profile on Experts.com.


The largest storage rack/ retrieval system, larger than two football fields and eighty feet wide was constructed to store 108 million pounds of paper products. On July, 2002, after two months of use, the facility collapsed and sparked a fire that destroyed the entire structure and 45 million pounds of paper. Nearly 50 fire departments responded to the inferno, which burned for three weeks. The owner of the facility sued a number of companies that included the contractor that designed and built the structure, a subcontractor, and the company that supplied the 110 foot steel columns. The plaintiff's counsel argued that the prime contractors had breached its contract to provide a structurally sound, state-of-the-art automated retrieval system, that the design, manufacturing and installation of the system were defective.

O'Donnell Consulting (OCE) was hired by the plaintiffs counsel to determine the cause of the accident. Using material and metallurgical analysis, as well as comprehensive finite element modeling, OCE determined that the structure had failed not only due to inadequate bracing, but also to improper construction and welding of the tubes used to support the facility. The tubes were formed by bending a flat shape into a square shape, then welded along the seam. OCE determined that the automatic welding of the tubes was defective and not of full thickness, and that there were methods available to inspect and check the welds coming off the production line, which the manufacturer had failed to perform. The counsel for the tube manufacturer had argued that the company's steel columns met industry standards, and that any open welds or defects occurred as a result of the collapse, rather than being the cause of the collapse.

The plaintiffs sought compensation, based on property damage, loss of business, and other factors, including reconstruction. After 4 weeks of deliberation, a jury determined a verdict for the plaintiffs in the amount of $63,335,819.


O'Donnell Consulting Engineers, Inc. (OCE) provides engineering, failure analysis, metallurgy, and expert witness services. Providing analytical, design, testing, and technical problem solving services for more than 30 years, our extensive experience gives us credibility in expert witness testimony. Our results are based on quantified engineering principles and analysis- not just opinions. We have testified in International, Federal, and State Courts, presenting comprehensive technical reports, models, and simulations that are easily understood by Judges and Juries.

©Copyright - All Rights Reserved

DO NOT REPRODUCE WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION BY AUTHOR.

Related articles

Mechanical-Safety-Engineering-Logo.gif

10/15/2013· Accident Investigation & Reconstruction

Forensic Clues: All-Terrain Vehicles

By: John Ryan, BSME, PE

Between 1982 and 1996, 2,795 people died riding all-terrain vehicles, ATV's. This was found in a study by the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC). Over thirty percent of the riders killed were under the age of sixteen.

Mechanical-Safety-Engineering-Logo.gif

8/9/2013· Accident Investigation & Reconstruction

Crash Data Retrieval - Modern Methods of Determining Crash Severity

By: John Ryan, BSME, PE

Automobile collisions result in damage to property and injuries to people. Compensation is sought through insurance claims, law suits, and product liability claims. Knowing when injuries are more or less severe than is warranted by the damage level involved in the collision is important information. This can help people involved on both sides of litigation or settlements.

Dick-Beaubien-Transportation-Engineer-photo.jpg

9/6/2017· Accident Investigation & Reconstruction

Case Study: Retained by Plaintiff Injured Motorist

By: Richard Beaubien

A motorist exiting a rural freeway was struck by a motorist on the intersecting State Route at the top of the exit ramp. At the westbound exit ramp from the Interstate freeway the State Route a stop sign is posted at the end of the ramp requiring exiting traffic to stop before entering the State Route. However, the eastbound off ramp traffic is not required to stop before entering the State Route. A stop sign is posted on southbound State Route at the ramp terminal. This is an unusual traffic signing pattern for interstate off ramps. Expert observations of the operation of this intersection showed that a large proportion of the eastbound off ramp traffic slowed down at the end of the ramp, expecting to stop at the State Route.

;
Experts.com-No broker Movie Ad

Follow us

linkedin logo youtube logo rss feed logo
;