By: Dr. Thomas Read
Tel: (707) 544-2374
Email Dr. Read
The fatigue failure initiated on the outside bottom where the carafe had been scratched with the abrasive scrub pad. As a result of cyclical thermal shock (between 195°C and 15°C), the cracks grew progressively till it reached a critical length. Glass thickness at the origins is approximately 3 mm. One failed after 12.
In order to simulate normal, use, coffee carafes were scratched with a chosen abrasive and thermal cycled. In this case a commercial scrub pad was used. It is a sponge with embedded 320-400 grit aluminum oxide. This scratching is to simulate both cleaning and sliding the carafe on hard counter tops. In this test, the bottom of a new borosilicate coffee carafe was scrubbed with a wet abrasive sponge and then thermal cycled numerous times till a visible crack formed. A carafe that failed after 51 cycles is examined. The progressive crack initiated at an abrasive scratch.
Figure #1: Photograph of the failed carafe bottom. The “wavy” nature of the crack indicates that it was driven by thermally generated stress.
Figure #2: Photomicrograph of the fracture origin on the fracture surface. The fracture originated at an abrasive scratch. As a result of thermal shock, the crack grew progressively till it reached a critical length. Glass thickness at the failure origin 2.8mm (Mag. 10X).
Figure #3: Higher power photomicrograph of the fracture origin on the fracture surface. The crack initiates on the outside bottom where the carafe had been scratched with the abrasive scrub pad. As a result of stresses from thermal shock, the crack grew progressively till it reached a critical length. Glass thickness at the origin 2.8mm (Mag. 40X.
Dr. Thomas L. Read, CEO of Read Consulting received his PhD. from Stanford University in 1972. He has over 25 years of manufacturing experience in electronics, metallurgy, factory safety, failure analysis, glass fracture, glass failure and bottle failure. As a member of the electronics industry, Dr. Read has earned process patents and has an extensive background in manufacturing techniques. In parallel, he has spent over twenty five years as a consultant to attorneys and engineers in the areas of failure analysis, metallurgy, glass fracture, glass failure, bottle failure, factory safety, manufacturing problems, intellectual property and patent disputes.
©Copyright - All Rights Reserved
DO NOT REPRODUCE WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION BY AUTHOR.
1/28/2006· Failure Analysis
By: Dr. Thomas Read
Note: Glass Fractography is the most effective method for determining why a glass object, such as a bottle, failed. This technique consists of examining the fracture surfaces of the failure for artifacts such as Wallner lines and using them to trace the crack back to its origin
9/26/2013· Failure Analysis
Forensic Clues: Seat Belt Failure
In 2007, an estimated 15,147 lives were saved from seat belt use. Seat belts save five times more lives than airbags, according to statistics released by NHTSA. Seat belt use has increased over the years, due to cultural trends, and possibly due to the enactment of seat belt use laws. Seat belt systems do not always function as predicted. Seat belt systems can fail during a collision, often resulting in serious injury or death to the vehicle occupant.
5/21/2012· Failure Analysis
Failure Analysis: Product Liability & Personal Injury Involving a Broken Grinding Wheel
By: Dr. Thomas Read
This grinding wheel was part of a product liability and personnel injury case. It was claimed that the subject wheel had unexpectedly failed (i.e. flown apart) and an escaping piece had hit the plaintiff in the face causing serious injuries. According to the user, the grinder with the wheel was purchased approximately one hour before the grinding wheel failure.
